
U.S. Court Declares Domain Names Not Protected On
May 5, 2000, a U.S. district court declared that domain names are not property.
If domain names aren't property, then those who falsify registration documents
in order to get them re-registered in their own names aren't thieves.
On May 5, 2000, a U.S. district court declared that domain
names are not property. What does that mean to you? For one thing, they can't
be stolen. According to Judge James Ware of the U.S. District Court of the Southern
District of California, domain names are a designation for a service, like a telephone
number. If they can't be stolen, then those who falsify registration documents
in order to get them re-registered in their own names aren't thieves. Sex.com
Owner Found Out the Hard Way This news came as some surprise to Gary
Kremen, the former owner of Sex.com. I say former owner because two years ago
Stephen Cohen, an ex-convict, submitted falsified papers to Network
Solutions to get Sex.com transferred to himself. When Kremen sued both Cohen
and Network Solutions to get the domain back, he learned that nothing had been
stolen from him; the judge dismissed the suit. The fact that Sex.com earns millions
a month was irrelevant to the argument. If no property had been stolen, then there's
no property law issue. (Kremen can still sue Cohen for committing a fraud against
him, by the way, so I'm not suggesting Cohen will get away with this.) Judge
Ware, in his ruling, made clear that he thought it was up to Congress to define
domain names as property, and until that time, they had no such protection. You'd
think that Al Gore, back when he was a senator inventing the Internet, would have
thought to define domain names as property. Transfer
Domain Registrations Now What does all this mean? It means that if
you have a domain name registered in the U.S., either with Network Solutions or
with one of the other official domain name registrars, you should consider transferring
the registration to a non-U.S.-based domain registrar. You can find a complete
list of authorized registrars at the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names
and Numbers (ICANN) with countries of operation. While I can't say which other
countries have specified whether domain names are property or a "designation for
a service" in any other country (and to my knowledge it hasn't been litigated
anywhere else), it is clear that the U.S. does not consider domain names property
and authorized agents "owners." In this case, the devil you know is clearly worse
than the devil you don't know. I participate in a few discussion lists about
ecommerce, and I repeatedly see messages from Web site owners asking where they
can get the best deals in domain registration. I suggest that all domain owners
and prospective domain owners reconsider the domain as a commodity item where
price is the only consideration. Here's my list of factors that domain owners
should consider, when comparing registrars: 1. Country
of operation: You may wish to use a registrar not in the U.S. until
Congress acts to define domain names as property. The lawyer I consulted in researching
this column informed me that, even if I live in the U.S. and the person who commits
fraud to re-register my domain name lives in the U.S., I can sue him in the courts
of the country in which my registrar operates, if the laws there are more favorable
to me. 2.Service accessibility: Can you
get through to speak to a person if you have a question? Perhaps the most remarkable
thing about the domain non-theft that took place with Sex.com is that Cohen was
able to get his fraudulent paperwork processed. Anyone who's ever tried to fax
any kind of transfer papers to Network Solutions knows how difficult it is. 3.Terms
of the contract: As a result of this decision, Network Solutions changed
its Service Agreement to reflect the fact that they are providing a service, rather
than a product. However, at the same time they also broadened the language of
their service agreement to include the following: "You agree that we may terminate
our service(s), including our domain name registration services, in the event
that you use such service(s) for any improper purpose, as determined in our sole
discretion." What does that mean? I don't know and I sure don't want to find out
with my own valuable domain name what, in their sole discretion, is "any improper
use." Do they mean that if I use my domain name to host content they don't like,
such as anecdotes about poor service at Network Solutions, I may lose my domain?
Be sure that any contract you agree to is one you can live with. No lawyer would
tell you to sign a contract with such vague language. They also have a clause
in their contract that tells you that you don't have to receive notification of
any changes in their contract, but that if they make any - simply by posting the
new service agreement to their site - they're automatically binding on you after
30 days. Would it be so difficult for them to send e-mail to authorized agents
when the contract changed? They could probably even charge a fee to authorized
agents for being kept in the loop. The smart registrar will have a pro-business
service agreement that gives businesses assurances of continued support, rather
than veiled threats to make their lives a living hell of litigation as lawyers
fight to sort out what was meant by vague statements in a contract. 4.
Dispute policy: Make sure that the dispute policy gives you plenty
of notice and time to respond if someone else does lay claim to your domain. The
burden of proof should always be on the person to whom the domain name is transferred.
The fact that Cohen could get the domain from Kremen without the dispute-resolution
process catching it is an indictment of the process that Network Solutions had
in place at the time. 5. Price: Most of the
other domain registrars charge less than Network Solutions (at $35/year). Price
should factor in, but if you have to pay a lawyer $225/hour to review the service
agreement, the actual cost of the domain will begin to look less important.
end |