| |||||||
|
|||||||
|
DSL Prime News: The Inside
Source Dave Burstein "The phone companies discovered you couldn't
train 10,000 installers or build a network to serve millions
as quickly as they thought" Now, those problems are mostly solved, while Germany, Japan, and Korea are moving three times faster than the U.S. It's time to remind Ed Whitacre that he promised in his last annual report, "SBC will make broadband transport service and applications available to nearly 100 percent of our wireline metro-area customers by 2003." Some else please whisper to Ivan Seidenberg he projected "90 percent coverage" in 2002. Remind them also they promised to bring the price back down. Meanwhile, others are investing despite the capex shortage. Worldcom offered nearly $20M to buy into the wholesale DSL business of three ISPs. Betsy Bernard of AT&T confirmed the NorthPoint COs will be re-lit, and AOL and MSN are playing a role in BellSouth's growth. Everest got funded. Things are looking up. Four companies responded to our free job posting offer. TI wants engineers, Garnet a US rep, AFC a project manager, and a respected ISP a COO. Details at end. Happy to help, especially as Verizon displaces 7,000 people. Worldcom/MCI bidding for
wholesale DSL MCI announced in 1999 and Bernie Ebbers confirmed the next year they would be major players in DSL, but didn't follow through. They worked closely with Rhythms from the beginning, including designing the Rhythms network to fit with theirs, and promising to deliver 100,000 customers to Rhythms. They almost bought Rhythms when the price was in the $B's, holding back only because their balance sheet could no longer support the debt. Covad bids around
$1,000/customer for Internet Connect If Covad only retains 75 percent of the customers (not implausible, since many have been sold VPN features not supported by Covad directly), they will have spent $1,000 for each customer. Covad bought only the assets and is not keeping employees, so IC salesmen are already trying to pull accounts away. McMinn and Knowling both have told us that Covad had learned not to overbid to drive up customer counts, a poor strategy now that the market wants earnings. But if MCI persists (or Sprint/AT&T jumps in), Covad may have some hard decisions. One of their largest ISPs commented last week Covad has been an excellent partner, but "perhaps plays too much hardball." Martha Sessums looks at the price differently. "Covad considers the purchase to be a much broader deal than just purchasing subs. Covad bought the assets of InternetConnect, which include customer data, customer leads, the VPN customers, the OSS and source code, intellectual property, trademark and all rights to use the trademark, cash on hand, accounts receivable, prepaid deposits, credits with vendors, unencumbered network equipment along with the subs. Also, Covad considers this an integration deal—we bought the DSL operation including service, billing and support and will use the resources to build up the business. With all these assets included in the purchase price, Covad actually paid in the ballpark of what it has paid for lines in the past. " If other than financial assets had that substantial a value, I believe Covad would have kept many of the employees responsible for them, however. The deal may prove unique, however, and I wouldn't extrapolate the price to other contexts. We're not in dot.com boom time, anymore. Come to New York! A priority for the $700M in federal money is infrastructure rebuilding, and I believe many companies can help build state-of-the-art services. MFN, Telseon, Cogent, and Yipes can deliver gig-e architecture, and I hope other creative companies jump right in. John Cioffi has been proclaiming that VDSL has significant advantages over fiber, and the short distances in Manhattan would be a great place to prove that idea. Loan terms are unusually generous, and specifically makes loans available to companies "that currently lack access to suitable credit." The greatest concentration of Internet traffic in the world is downtown, so it has always been a natural location for communications interchange and operations. National companies— even those not currently active in Manhattan—are encouraged to apply for government funds to invest downtown. Next Page: AOL's missing 2,000,000 Copyright 2002 Dave Burstein. |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| |||||||