internet.com Corp.
ISP-Planet Home Page

 


Sections

 • Best of the Lists
 • Business
 • CLEC-Planet
 • Equipment
 • Executive
   Perspectives

 • Fixed Wireless
 • Investor
 • Marketing
 • Market Research
 • News
 • Notable Quotes
 • Politics
 • Profiles
 • Resources
 • Technology
 • Value-Added
   Services

 • Webhosting

Also ...
 • About Us
 • Authors

 • Letters
 • Site Map
 • Technology Jobs


 
ISP Glossary
Find an ISP Term
 
Search ISP-Planet


Search internet.com
 
internet.com

Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner

ISP Business

The Backbone That Grows — continued

 

Email a colleague

He says the network has had a 99.99 percent reliability at layer 3. Most backbones, he says, refuse to report reliability statistics at layer 3 because layer 1 statistics are more flattering. "You can have a connection at layer 1 and have a failure at layer 3."

He adds that the statistics that the RBOCs use at the FCC explicitly leave out significant outages, those that last longer than 30 minutes and affect more than 30,000 people.

Nevertheless, we have heard complaints about the quality of Cogent's backbone. Schaeffer lists a number of potential reasons. Number one is this. "Our competitors do spread misinformation."

Number two is peering agreement. "Our peers are capacity constrained. One large U.S. ISP has a volume restriction in the Bay Area. They may drop packets or route traffic sub optimally through their network, forcing us to hand off to them elsewhere."

Number three is that Cogent does disconnect some customers. "We, like any ISP, have an AUP. We allow no spam, child porn, or terrorist information. We disconnect all violators. We disconnect about 10 content or network providers per month for repeated violations. We have to because there's no number portability on the 'net. If you let people do bad things, your legitimate customers suffer."

Number four is about peering. In 2003, ISP-Planet reported on a peering fight between AOL and Cogent (see War at the Core). Schaeffer cannot discuss details but admits that there have been other instances of this problem.

"We have 920 peering session in 41 locations," Schaeffer says. "Service providers have to maintain a balance between push and pull traffic. ISPs pull traffic, and content providers push traffic."

Cogent will have a tough time keeping this balance because its customers push so much traffic. "Our largest customer is 8 Gbps," Schaeffer says. He breaks down the bandwidth use of his customers this way (he's just come from an investor meeting where he presented the same data):

  % of customer population % of revenue % of bandwidth
Service providers 19 50 86
Enterprises and universities 81 50 14

The challenge of profitability
Cogent still needs more revenue. One encouraging sign, Schaeffer says, is that customers are happy and are ordering more. "40 percent of sales in the service provider segment are additional sales to existing customers. This is rare in the enterprise segment because few enterprises need more than the initial 100 Mbps."

Although the revenue trend is upward, the company will need to control costs as it adds customers. The latest SEC filing seems to suggest that the combination of operating expenses (the cost of the network) and selling, general, and administrative expenses (the cost of sales and of employees) are rising as fast as revenues. This will have to change.

Schaeffer believes it will change during 2005. Although the company has never throughout its history issued earnings guidance, it plans to begin doing so this year. "We're still cash flow negative but we're showing a strong trend line," he says.

End

Related articles:
  [June 20, 2003] Cisco, VCs Take Over as Cogent Restructures
  [Jan. 24, 2003] War at the Core
  [Feb. 6, 2002] Cogent Communications: LAN on Steroids

< Back to page one

 

 

Feedback


Advertising inquiry? Click here!

ISP-Planet's RSS feed

 

#