| |||||||||||||||
![]()
|
|||||||||||||||
|
The Legitimacy of Instant Messaging If your technical support staff is using instant messaging to collaborate on solving technical problems, is that a good thing or a waste of human resources?
On the ISP-Tech list in January, PJ asked:
[SP advised] "You might be able to do it if you can monitor the traffic by the application if you have that capability." DB had several suggestions: "This is a social problem. Fix it with an AUP. No one really wants to lose a job now, right? You could filter stuff using Zorp or a similar proxy. Blocking by name for yahoo is cs[1-8].yahoo.com, scs[1-8].yahoo.com. Of course, you might not mind blocking those domains." [DP asked] "Are you talking about blocking it for your employees or your network in general?" [PJ replied] "Employees. Maybe blocking port 80 UDP would help?" Several respondents recommended clarifying corporate policy. [AB advised] "Make sure your employees don't need IM before you block them." [RR added] "What about a company policy that says nobody can use IM? If you've go to resort to blocking ports then I believe there's an underlying problem or solution that you are ignoring." [GK suggested] "I know of a company that got rid of an 800-page employee rule book andreplaced it with
Productivity went up noticeably." [PJ explained] "I need to find out which of my people are truly qualified and weed out the 'paper certifications' folks. It's sneaky but I like the idea." Respondents were baffled. [JS asked] "Am I the only one who finds this ironic?" [CF agreed] "Yeah, maybe they ought to cut off mail list access too. But then the people who were trying to ask how to filter IM packets would look 'challenged' also." End
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
#